Risk Factors Associated with Mortality among Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (J-RECOVER Study).

Objective Mortality analyses of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in Japan are limited. The present study therefore determined the risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods This retrospective cohort study used the dataset from the Japanese multicenter research of COVID-19 by assembling real-word data (J-RECOVER) study that was conducted between January 1 and September 31, 2020. Independent risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival were calculated for different age groups. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in survival rates according to additional risk factors, including an older age and chronic pulmonary disease. Patients A total of 561 patients were eligible. The median age was 67 (interquartile range: 56-75) years old, 442 (78.8%) were men, and 151 (26.9%) died in the hospital. Results Age, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal disease were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Compared with patients 18-54 years old, the adjusted odds ratios of patients 55-64, 65-74, and 75-94 years old were 3.34 (95% CI, 1.34-8.31), 7.07 (95% CI, 3.05-16.40), and 18.43 (95% CI, 7.94-42.78), respectively. Conclusion Age, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal disease were independently associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, and age was the most decisive indicator of a poor prognosis. Our results may aid in formulating treatment strategies and allocating healthcare resources.

Relationship between institutional intensive care volume prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and in-hospital death in ventilated patients with severe COVID-19.

We aimed to evaluate the association between ICU patient volume before the COVID-19 pandemic and the outcomes of ventilated COVID-19 patients. We analyzed ventilated patients with COVID-19 aged > 17 years and enrolled in the J-RECOVER study, a retrospective multicenter observational study conducted in Japan between January and September 2020. Based on the number of patients admitted to the ICU between January and December 2019, the top third institutions were defined as high-volume centers, the middle third ones as middle-volume centers, and the bottom third ones as low-volume centers. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for in-hospital mortality and ICU patient volume was performed after adjusting for multiple propensity scores. Among 461 patients, 158, 158, and 145 patients were admitted to low-volume (20 institutions), middle-volume (14 institutions), and high-volume (13 institutions) centers, respectively. Admission to middle- and high-volume centers was not significantly associated with in-hospital death compared with admission to low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-2.25] and adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI: 0.31-1.94], respectively). In conclusion, institutional intensive care patient volume prior to the COVID-19 pandemic was not significantly associated with in-hospital death in ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Early intubation and decreased in-hospital mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Some academic organizations recommended that physicians intubate patients with COVID-19 with a relatively lower threshold of oxygen usage particularly in the early phase of pandemic. We aimed to elucidate whether early intubation is associated with decreased in-hospital mortality among patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who required intubation. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted at 66 hospitals in Japan where patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 were treated between January and September 2020. Patients who were diagnosed as COVID-19 with a positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test and intubated during admission were included. Early intubation was defined as intubation conducted in the setting of ≤ 6 L/min of oxygen usage. In-hospital mortality was compared between patients with early and non-early intubation. Inverse probability weighting analyses with propensity scores were performed to adjust patient demographics, comorbidities, hemodynamic status on admission and time at intubation, medications before intubation, severity of COVID-19, and institution characteristics. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of age, severity of hypoxemia at intubation, and days from admission to intubation. RESULTS: Among 412 patients eligible for the study, 110 underwent early intubation. In-hospital mortality was lower in patients with early intubation than those with non-early intubation (18 [16.4%] vs. 88 [29.1%]; odds ratio, 0.48 [95% confidence interval 0.27-0.84]; p = 0.009, and adjusted odds ratio, 0.28 [95% confidence interval 0.19-0.42]; p < 0.001). The beneficial effects of early intubation were observed regardless of age and severity of hypoxemia at time of intubation; however, early intubation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality only among patients who were intubated later than 2 days after admission. CONCLUSIONS: Early intubation in the setting of ≤ 6 L/min of oxygen usage was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 who required intubation. Trial Registration None.

Thrombin generation capacity is enhanced by low antithrombin activity and depends on the activity of the related coagulation factors.

BACKGROUND: Supplementation with antithrombin (AT) concentrates is now common in the treatment of congenital and acquired AT deficiency. However, there is no established consensus on the target and timing of supplementation. We aimed to elucidate the effects of AT deficiency on the balance between coagulation activation and inhibition using a thrombin generation assay as in vitro global assay. METHODS: Samples were prepared by admixing commercially acquired AT-deficient plasma with < 1% AT activity with pooled normal plasma. The AT activity in each sample was adjusted to 100, 90, 70, 50, 40, 30, 10, 5, and < 1%. A thrombin generation assay was performed in each sample. AT concentrate-spiked samples were also prepared by adjusting the AT activities in four types of the concentrates: one recombinant and three plasma-derived AT concentrates. The final targeted AT activities in the samples were adjusted to 100, 50, 30, and 5% by spiking each concentrate into the AT-deficient plasma. We also prepared samples with five levels of prothrombin time (PT) % in coagulation factors with the AT activity fixed at 30% by dilution by mixing AT-deficient plasma and normal plasma with Owren's veronal buffer to adjust the coagulation factor activities in several proportions. The theoretical target PT% values were 100, 66, 50, 40, and 30%. A thrombin generation assay was performed on all samples. RESULTS: The ability to generate thrombin depended on the AT activity, and the amount of thrombin generation was increased as AT was decreased. Additionally, the amount of thrombin generation was changed significantly when AT activity was ≤ 50%, indicating that AT suppressed thrombin generation. In particular, thrombin generation was remarkable when AT activity was < 30%, and it can be assumed that the prognosis is poor due to organ failure from thrombotic tendency. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this basic research were found to be consistent with the clinical findings to date. The mechanism by which 30-50% of AT activity is set as the clinical boundary was elucidated by the thrombin generation assay.

Characterization of fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products reagents and their utility in critical care patients with enhanced fibrinolysis.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) values reflect coagulation and fibrinolysis status, and FDP levels are helpful for diagnosis and classification of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). FDP measurement has always played a key role in diagnosing DIC, a phenomenon that has recently gained renewed attention because of its occurrence in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Although the evaluation of FDP is crucial for the management of critical care, the variability among FDP reagents is unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare LIASAUTO P-FDP with three FDP reagents and investigate their characteristics. METHODS: In total, 172 plasmas samples were used in the correlation. The sample data were divided into three groups including negative, no and positive discrepancy based on the discrepancy percentages calculated from each correlation between LIASAUTO P-FDP and other three reagents. D-dimer, plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), fibrin monomer complex (FMC), fibrinogen (Fbg) and Plasmin-α2 Plasmin Inhibitor (α2 PI) were measured and included in data analysis. RESULTS: The positive discrepancy groups showed higher D-dimer, PIC and FMC values than the negative discrepancy groups. The data indicated that LIASAUTO P-FDP had higher reactivity to D-dimer than other reagents and the values were elevated in the fibrinolysis-enhanced samples with various FDP fragments. CONCLUSION: LIASAUTO P-FDP displayed the reactivity towards various fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products, and it might be useful for DIC diagnosis because the fibrinolytic status differed in the DIC types and stages.